J-Body Automobiles Forum banner

shitty ford Ranger

5249 Views 13 Replies 12 Participants Last post by  bondo07
Well i was at my friends house and this dude pulls up in a maunal 4x4 ford rangeraround a 95 or so. He comes squealing threw his gears and pulls up. I asked him what he had, and he replied. " a 4.0 with a turbo set up" so im thinking ok hes got a manual ive got an auto. hes got a 4.0 i got 2.8, hes got a turbo i got n/a. He wanted to race and i said sure but id prob lose. We ended up going back to his place where he had some concrete slab type thing in his field. We lined up and we gunned it on 3, i instantly pulled on him and stayed aheadgot a good 4 or 5 lengths on him. He got out and said his tires were squealing so he didnt get traction so he put it in 4x4. We lined up again and gunned it on 3. he stayed next to me for a good 2 or 3 seconds until i pulled on him and gained 2 to 3 lengths on him withen a 1/4 mile. I dont see how i could have beat him when he had so many more advantages against me. Anyone ever raced one or can put their two cents in cause i thought i shoulda lost.
Status
Not open for further replies.
1 - 14 of 14 Posts
power to weight ratio? different gearing? driver? it can go on.
88cavalierz24 said:
power to weight ratio? different gearing? driver? it can go on.
or he had a 4 cylinder, and no turbo and blatantly lied to you :D lol.
barrok69 said:
88cavalierz24 said:
power to weight ratio? different gearing? driver? it can go on.
or he had a 4 cylinder, and no turbo and blatantly lied to you :D lol.
X2 :lol:
G
Or, its a freakin truck, 4x4 at that :wink:
i like how no one mentioned the fact...that it was a ford :p

but seriously, he lied to you...or you have a factory FREEEEEEEEAAAAAAAKKKK
A stock 2.8 auto conv runs 17's.... I used to have the same car only a 3.1.

It could of had a turbo and just ran like shit, no tune, etc or just have been a 2.3. But a stock 4.0 5 speed should run faster than a 17.
oh oh oh... pick me I know.... Its a damn FORD! It dont matter what you got in a ford, their still nothing but a POS.
I've seen SOHC 4.0 5 Speed RAngers walk fox body Mustangs. They do have good get'up for a little truck.
techoverload said:
oh oh oh... pick me I know.... Its a damn FORD! It dont matter what you got in a ford, their still nothing but a POS.
X2. Being a 4X4, the weight of the extra drive train almost mathes the weight of a J-body :lol:
acurategguy said:
techoverload said:
oh oh oh... pick me I know.... Its a damn FORD! It dont matter what you got in a ford, their still nothing but a POS.
X2. Being a 4X4, the weight of the extra drive train almost mathes the weight of a J-body :lol:
buddy of mine has 2 rangers, one's a 4x4 and hes got a f150. he keeps bragging that their the shit but none of them can keep up with me.

He keeps saying to let him build them up and then he'll run me, well hell let me build my z a lil more and he'll still be nothing but a blur in my rear view.

ITS A FORD! its always been shit, will always be shit and no matter how you build it, it's still SHIT!

Just because its a cavalier dont mean its slow.
robtco99 said:
A stock 2.8 auto conv runs 17's.... I used to have the same car only a 3.1.

It could of had a turbo and just ran like shit, no tune, etc or just have been a 2.3. But a stock 4.0 5 speed should run faster than a 17.
Thats wrong. My stock 2.8 auto with a slipping trans ran a 16.2
a 5.0 or 4.0 4x4 would beat yall threw the mudd easyly..
jammert609 said:
a 5.0 or 4.0 4x4 would beat yall threw the mudd easyly..
Dude stop digging up old threads!! seriously! Look at the damn date at the top of every single freaking post in the thread. I mean may of 07 this thread, 2002 in the last one you posted in?
1 - 14 of 14 Posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top